Vegan Bodybuilding & Fitness

Healthy Food Defines You
It is currently Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:58 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Ridiculous stuff I just found
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 3:41 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 6067
Location: England
I was browsing for information about The Blair Witch project, when I came across this:

http://www.capalert.com/capreports/blairwitch.htm

I can barely believe how pedantic it is. Look at the scale at the bottom of the page also:

Image

Note how (as far as I can tell) they think that homosexuality is something which needs to be monitored. Whattjatalkinbaat??


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 3:44 pm 
Offline
Manatee
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 12:40 pm
Posts: 276
Location: Houston, TX
Hmmm. Wonder where my picture of the Bare Witch Project went...?

_________________
In Solidarity With Animals store - AR clothing


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 3:45 pm 
Offline
Elephant
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 3:33 pm
Posts: 2293
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
I disagree with the chart, there was not nearly enough sex in the movie.

I do agree that there wasn't enough wanton violence and not nearly enough offense to god. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 3:45 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 6067
Location: England
Argh I cannot believe what I'm reading:

"One hundred thirty seven uses of the most foul of the foul words. *The Blair Witch Project* actually beat *South Park:BLU* in use of the most foul of the foul words. Also were 71 uses of other three/four letter foul words PLUS 17 uses of God's name in vain, 6 of which were with the foul letter expletive and 3 of which were vain use of the name of our Savior. All other ignominy were paled by such a flip-off attitude. Yet one more excuse to lower standards of acceptance I suppose."

I think they have their priorities all wrong


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 3:46 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 6067
Location: England
An explanation of the chart: things which score near 100 are 'morally acceptable'. The lower the score, the more immoral it is. So Blair Witch gets 0 / 100 for offense to God. Meaning that it has totally offended God. I bet He is totally P'D TO THE O about Blair Witch.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 3:56 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 6067
Location: England
Ouch, Butterfly Effect, they really were offended by!!

Image

I thought Butterfly Effect was an incredibly moral film which taught self-sacrifice! I totally don't get this website

OMGOMG ETC

Check out what negative things they have to say about Butterfly Effect! I can't believe it: (from a list of reasons why the film is immoral)

"punk/goth, repeatedly
facial/body piercings, repeatedly
massive tattoos"

The first "punk/goth, repeatedly" I can only assume means that there were goths/punks in the film!!! Oh how terrible! Cover your eyes!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:16 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 6067
Location: England
Sorry to keep posting, but you've GOT TO BE KIDDING ME. Finding Nemo, doesn't get a perfect score. Here's why: (I have high-lighted the particularly ridiculous)

"attack to eat with a father's loss of his entire family (400+) but one - Nemo (non-graphic)
fright factors
additional attacks to eat
series of posterior references and jokes/comments by young adolescents
adolescent defiance
"I hate you" from adolescent son to father
suggestion of flatulence"


Okay. Anyway, the film is about fish anyway. So they say that an attack on fish is immoral? So a film in which people eat fish should be immoral too right? Well they don't say so in other films. They just seem to want to say that everything is immoral, and they're totally inconsistent pahalyaahaaaaa (that's not a real word).

Freddy VS Jason scores ZERO, meaning that the film is totally immoral. Haha.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:33 pm 
Offline
Manatee
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 492
Location: portland
What site is that from?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:37 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 6067
Location: England
The site I posted in my initial post:

http://www.capalert.com

you can see a list of films they have commented upon here:

http://www.capalert.com/capreports/

High stupidity


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:38 pm 
Offline
Manatee
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 492
Location: portland
if you want to see f*cked up look at this

http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:18 am 
Offline
Elephant
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 3:38 pm
Posts: 1869
Location: Vegan Strength Cult, German HQ
:lol:

Thanks for the laugh, Richard!

But i agree with the CAP on this part:

Quote:
*The Blair Witch Project* was an empty movie. There was nothing there except attempts at fright. It was bare of any need for intelligence. Void of any special effects, this film relied on our supposed innate fear of the unseen to project its impact.

I thought Blair witch was crap, too.
Though i wasn't exactly offended by it. Hm. I'm not divine enough, probably.

_________________
No one said it would be easy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 12:52 pm 
Offline
Manatee
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 12:40 pm
Posts: 276
Location: Houston, TX
The Bare Witch Project:

Image

_________________
In Solidarity With Animals store - AR clothing


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 12:57 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 6067
Location: England
What is the mum doing? Covering the boy's ear? Ha


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 1:00 pm 
Offline
Manatee
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 12:40 pm
Posts: 276
Location: Houston, TX
She's still reaching to cover his eyes, silly kniggit.

_________________
In Solidarity With Animals store - AR clothing


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 1:37 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 6067
Location: England
Ahoy, it makes sense


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  



{ ASACP_CREDITS }
{ ASACP_CREDITS }
{ ASACP_CREDITS } Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group