Cold Fission wrote:
Refusing animal products all together is the way to get companies to only make vegan options.
As long as there is demand for animal products in general, there will be more than adequate supply. Besides, I do not believe that any kind of meaningful, long-term change could come about through the market.
Cold Fission wrote:
And i would not eat a product of torture.
Oh, you will. Harvesting grains and other plant foods is responsible for a considerable amount of animal deaths each year.
And you will also:
-
read a product of torture;
- use transportation other than your own two feet, thus contributing to climate change, which, in turn, harms animals;
etc., etc. It's not as clear-cut as we'd like to believe.
We can not exist on this planet without inflicting at least a little bit of misery and death on animals.
Cold Fission wrote:
Take more pride in yourselves and you beliefs.
I do not "have" beliefs in that I don't cherish them as my property - as some
thing that I have complete control over for whole eternity. I like to think of any ideas I currently sympathise with as provisional rather than final. So, in the case of veganism, as I've already mentioned in my previous post, "[it] isn't about purity or following rigid rules, but, rather, about minimizing animal abuse. And there's more to it than just doing this and not doing that."