Are Vegans At A Disadvantage?

Anything else on your mind that you would like to discuss with other like-minded people.

Moderators: Mini Forklift Ⓥ, C.O., Richard, robert, SyrLinus

Message
Author
JFCotman
Finch
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:19 pm

Are Vegans At A Disadvantage?

#1 Postby JFCotman » Thu Sep 20, 2012 2:51 pm

I am new to body building but have been a vegan since 2008 and have to ask. I just read this by renowned body builder who goes by the name of 'Scooby' who lead me to this site. He said the following:

"Now lets look at the problem that vegans face. The highest quality protein available to them is soy and it only has a quality of 117, nowhere near as good as chicken or eggs. They need to be experts on the amino acid profiles of everything they eat so they can combine food through out the day to get the all the essential amino acids they need. The second major obstacle vegans face is in getting enough protein without exceeding their daily caloric budget. All the proteins available to vegans also come with a healthy dose of carbohydrates so vegans need to be very, very strict about their nutrition in order to get sufficient protein with the amount of calories they have available."

Having found this great community, I would love to know what you guys are doing about this.

To learn more about the issue of protein quality, please visit the page cited below.

Thank you!


Why Vegans Are At A Disadvantage
http://scoobysworkshop.com/vegetarianism/#

User avatar
Hapexamendios
Rabbit
Posts: 51
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:57 pm
Location: Spokane, wa

Re: Are Vegans At A Disadvantage?

#2 Postby Hapexamendios » Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:22 pm

Didn't Scooby end up going veggie/vegan too?
Either way, I really enjoy his videos, he's got a great personality.
“Life is like a movie, if you've sat through more than half of it and it’s sucked every second so far... No one should blame you for walking out early.”

JFCotman
Finch
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:19 pm

Re: Are Vegans At A Disadvantage?

#3 Postby JFCotman » Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:07 pm

Thanks for the reply

Scooby is a vegetarian but not a vegan in that he does allow things like milk and eggs into his diet.

User avatar
Richard
Site Admin
Posts: 6064
Age: 34
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Location: England
Contact:

Re: Are Vegans At A Disadvantage?

#4 Postby Richard » Fri Sep 21, 2012 1:08 am

He says on his website that he is not vegetarian

"As an aside, I do eat meat once or twice a week"
Image

decbolton
Rabbit
Posts: 36
Age: 23
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 2:35 am

Re: Are Vegans At A Disadvantage?

#5 Postby decbolton » Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:08 am

I see no real disadvantage, as far as I'm aware at any rate. Check out durianrider on YouTube, not a body builder but an impressive athlete non the less

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

User avatar
Fallen_Horse
Elephant
Posts: 2341
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Contact:

Re: Are Vegans At A Disadvantage?

#6 Postby Fallen_Horse » Fri Sep 21, 2012 10:34 am

I think for bodybuilding there is a definite disadvantage, but the disadvantage is mostly in food options. You have very few things you can choose to eat because you have to constantly eat high protein foods.

For endurance athletics, I think the difference is minimal, if any.
Learning how to be compassionate, gain wisdom, and love life.

multipass
Rabbit
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:27 pm
Location: CO

Re: Are Vegans At A Disadvantage?

#7 Postby multipass » Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:16 pm

I would think the advantage is just that meat eaters can get calories requirements much easier, where as we would have to eat much more.

I don't think their protein is "better".

User avatar
Richard
Site Admin
Posts: 6064
Age: 34
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Location: England
Contact:

Re: Are Vegans At A Disadvantage?

#8 Postby Richard » Sat Sep 29, 2012 4:48 am

I am not an expert by any means at all, and everything I know is really anecdotal. But, looking through the profiles on this website, you can see what people have achieved. None of them say "when I switched to veganism, things got much harder". So I find it unlikely that there is a disadvantage, of any significance.

The ratio of vegans to non-vegans is very, very low. Add to that, most vegans are actually not interested in fitness or bodybuilding (I think, primarily because the people who become vegan do it for ethical reasons, and are generally less concerned with what they look like, and more concerned with animal rights issues etc). So, there are going to be hardly any examples of vegan bodybuilders (in comparison to non-vegan bodybuilders). With such a difference in numbers, of course there will also be larger numbers of non-vegan bodybuilders who achieve larger size. I don't think that that indicates that it's harder for vegans, it's more likely to me that there are just less vegans who are aiming for that.

There may also be mistakes that people make when becoming vegan, but I don't think that means that veganism is "hard" to deal with. The changes needed (primarily, eating more of the right foods) are not complex.

Finally I want to add that it's not as clear cut as saying "non-veganism leads to better results than veganism". First of all, non-veganism and veganism are not black and white. It's not as though everyone who eats a non-vegan diet eats precisely the same meals as each other, and likewise, the same is not true of vegans. So it's impossible to compare. But even more importantly, just comparing the lifestyles on what they may do for your bodybuilding short-term (over a span of a few years), is ultimately irrelevant when you consider what high levels of animals products will do to you long term. I realise the following is a little extreme, but you could find a drug which pumps you up and makes your muscles huge for 10 years, then after that it kills you. You might say "people who don't take that drug are at a disadvantage in terms of bodybuilding" - but would you recommend people take it?
Image

User avatar
OliveBlood
Rabbit
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2012 2:39 pm

Re: Are Vegans At A Disadvantage?

#9 Postby OliveBlood » Wed Oct 24, 2012 2:42 am

Until better vegan protein products were developed, yes, there was a very real disadvantage.

Now, I'm fairly confident you can be a beast and a vegan at the same time. The fact is that high achievement in anything is usually difficult and is rare by definition, so whether or not there's a disadvantage is immaterial - it's always hard.

User avatar
Richard
Site Admin
Posts: 6064
Age: 34
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Location: England
Contact:

Re: Are Vegans At A Disadvantage?

#10 Postby Richard » Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:06 am

There are guys on the site like Edward Goins who do great without supplements.
Image

User avatar
vegan_rossco
Batman
Posts: 1632
Age: 26
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 6:15 am
Location: Isle of Wight, England

Re: Are Vegans At A Disadvantage?

#11 Postby vegan_rossco » Wed Oct 24, 2012 12:17 pm

Scooby is great but he is a bit of a food nazi (he even admits this)
to be honest though, whether or not I am at a disadvantage being a vegan with an ambition to grow strength and size I don't mind at all, I certainly wouldn't quit being vegan just to make better gains.
klaatu21 wrote:sensai ross, forgive me for doubting you and myself

Mini Forklift Ⓥ wrote:There's only one thing I'm riding at 6am, and it's not a bike!

viewtopic.php?f=24&t=29098
http://www.facebook.com/ross.d.cosgrove

User avatar
vegan_rossco
Batman
Posts: 1632
Age: 26
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 6:15 am
Location: Isle of Wight, England

Re: Are Vegans At A Disadvantage?

#12 Postby vegan_rossco » Wed Oct 24, 2012 12:20 pm

Richard wrote:I am not an expert by any means at all, and everything I know is really anecdotal. But, looking through the profiles on this website, you can see what people have achieved. None of them say "when I switched to veganism, things got much harder". So I find it unlikely that there is a disadvantage, of any significance.

The ratio of vegans to non-vegans is very, very low. Add to that, most vegans are actually not interested in fitness or bodybuilding (I think, primarily because the people who become vegan do it for ethical reasons, and are generally less concerned with what they look like, and more concerned with animal rights issues etc). So, there are going to be hardly any examples of vegan bodybuilders (in comparison to non-vegan bodybuilders). With such a difference in numbers, of course there will also be larger numbers of non-vegan bodybuilders who achieve larger size. I don't think that that indicates that it's harder for vegans, it's more likely to me that there are just less vegans who are aiming for that.

There may also be mistakes that people make when becoming vegan, but I don't think that means that veganism is "hard" to deal with. The changes needed (primarily, eating more of the right foods) are not complex.

Finally I want to add that it's not as clear cut as saying "non-veganism leads to better results than veganism". First of all, non-veganism and veganism are not black and white. It's not as though everyone who eats a non-vegan diet eats precisely the same meals as each other, and likewise, the same is not true of vegans. So it's impossible to compare. But even more importantly, just comparing the lifestyles on what they may do for your bodybuilding short-term (over a span of a few years), is ultimately irrelevant when you consider what high levels of animals products will do to you long term. I realise the following is a little extreme, but you could find a drug which pumps you up and makes your muscles huge for 10 years, then after that it kills you. You might say "people who don't take that drug are at a disadvantage in terms of bodybuilding" - but would you recommend people take it?


spot on matey! +1
klaatu21 wrote:sensai ross, forgive me for doubting you and myself

Mini Forklift Ⓥ wrote:There's only one thing I'm riding at 6am, and it's not a bike!

viewtopic.php?f=24&t=29098
http://www.facebook.com/ross.d.cosgrove

Tarz
Elephant
Posts: 1193
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 5:02 am

Re: Are Vegans At A Disadvantage?

#13 Postby Tarz » Tue Oct 30, 2012 5:54 am

vegan_rossco wrote:
Richard wrote:I am not an expert by any means at all, and everything I know is really anecdotal. But, looking through the profiles on this website, you can see what people have achieved. None of them say "when I switched to veganism, things got much harder". So I find it unlikely that there is a disadvantage, of any significance.

The ratio of vegans to non-vegans is very, very low. Add to that, most vegans are actually not interested in fitness or bodybuilding (I think, primarily because the people who become vegan do it for ethical reasons, and are generally less concerned with what they look like, and more concerned with animal rights issues etc). So, there are going to be hardly any examples of vegan bodybuilders (in comparison to non-vegan bodybuilders). With such a difference in numbers, of course there will also be larger numbers of non-vegan bodybuilders who achieve larger size. I don't think that that indicates that it's harder for vegans, it's more likely to me that there are just less vegans who are aiming for that.

There may also be mistakes that people make when becoming vegan, but I don't think that means that veganism is "hard" to deal with. The changes needed (primarily, eating more of the right foods) are not complex.

Finally I want to add that it's not as clear cut as saying "non-veganism leads to better results than veganism". First of all, non-veganism and veganism are not black and white. It's not as though everyone who eats a non-vegan diet eats precisely the same meals as each other, and likewise, the same is not true of vegans. So it's impossible to compare. But even more importantly, just comparing the lifestyles on what they may do for your bodybuilding short-term (over a span of a few years), is ultimately irrelevant when you consider what high levels of animals products will do to you long term. I realise the following is a little extreme, but you could find a drug which pumps you up and makes your muscles huge for 10 years, then after that it kills you. You might say "people who don't take that drug are at a disadvantage in terms of bodybuilding" - but would you recommend people take it?


spot on matey! +1

Seconded!
Davey's favourite tipple was "Blow My Skull", a cocktail he served in half-pint glasses consisting of rum, brandy, gin, port, Madeira, sherry and claret.

Charlotte_may
Finch
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2012 6:57 am

Re: Are Vegans At A Disadvantage?

#14 Postby Charlotte_may » Tue Oct 30, 2012 7:58 am

Well I have researched that sietan (wheat gluten) is the guest form of protein for a vegan. 16g per 100g
So how much Protien would I need to eat if my BF is 21 I want to be about 15 BF.

Thanks

User avatar
ryansmith
Rabbit
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 8:00 am

Re: Are Vegans At A Disadvantage?

#15 Postby ryansmith » Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:23 am

Going vegan has its own advantages rather than disadvantages.


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 8 guests