Vegan Bodybuilding & Fitness

Healthy Food Defines You
It is currently Thu Oct 02, 2014 11:30 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Non-HIIT Cardio - not effective?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 13, 2014 9:52 am 
Offline
Finch

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 8:40 am
Posts: 2
hi guys,
first time poster. 7 years vegan, 21 years old, 179cm/5"10', 68.5kg/150lbs

im not interested in bulking, but very keen on building lean muscles and lose body fat.
i've been doing cardio (jogging for 30-40 minutes) and swimming (30x50m over 45minutes) for about 2 years and i've recently started going to the gym constantly the last 2 months. the changes are obvious, in the sense my arms and chest are getting bigger and more firm when flexed. but my goal is to have very defined muscles, how do i achieve this? should i only be focusing on cardio or going to the gym? i sometimes do cardio on the same day of my gym workout. do i really lose lean muscles from doing these cardio exercises? cheers


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Non-HIIT Cardio - not effective?
PostPosted: Fri Feb 14, 2014 11:38 am 
Offline
Gorilla

Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 10:40 pm
Posts: 593
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
You should be doing both. Doing a lot of solid state cardio (i.e. treadmill) will lead to some loss of muscle mass, so you need to counteract that with strength training. The most optimal way to burn bodyfat is with HIIT training; plyometrics, power-based cardio, the kind you see on the P90X and Insanity programs. I like to combine these two things when I train. So, for example, I'll do a set of squats using heavy weights (heavy for me), and then immediately follow up with something like box jumps, or squat jumps, lunge jumps, etc. I don't always tie the HIIT exercise to the same muscle group as my strength exercise . . . So, I could do something like deadlift, and then 60 seconds of high-knees, or something like that. Those aren't really the same muscle groups directly, but I think the point is to challenge your heart-rate, while also building muscle. I've found this to be very effective for me, having gone from 248lbs to 154lbs in under 2 years, and from 38% body fat to 16% body fat in the same time. If you want, check out my training log, should what I wrote above not make sense.

HIT Rob knows a ton about this stuff. You could look into his training as well, and ask him a question.

_________________
My Training Blog: http://veganbodybuilding.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=35725


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Non-HIIT Cardio - not effective?
PostPosted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 9:38 am 
Offline
Rabbit

Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2013 10:12 am
Posts: 128
Replace jogging with full on wind sprints. Don't take breaks between sets; do burpees instead. Stick to mainly compound movements that work the entire body or large portions of the body. Basically crossfit and no more sissy cardio should do it. Working out in the morning on an empty stomach increases the metabolism (and testosterone as a bonus) more than eating before exercise.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Non-HIIT Cardio - not effective?
PostPosted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 6:53 pm 
Offline
Rabbit
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2011 9:34 am
Posts: 91
Location: Austin, Tx
Having defined muscle involves two things. 1. Building Muscle and 2. Losing body fat. Doing both at the same time is difficult but not impossible. To build you need to do some sort of resistance training. Losing body fat is going to be more about diet than anything. To do it you have to run a calorie deficit. Either HIIT or steady start cardio will help in doing that. HIIT is more effective if you are pressed for time (30 minute-ish workouts) and steady state works well if you have longer periods of time to exercise (40 min +). Personally I mix the two for variety because doing either repeatedly just leaves me board. So, do whichever works for you or do a ratio you like.

Also, just going on the numbers you posted (30-40 mins of jogging and swimming 1500 meters) you are getting more a calorie burn out of the jogging than the swimming. Swimming has a higher perceived work due to the resistance of the water and restricted breathing but you are likely only burning 300-350 calories in that time where as just jogging for the same time would put you at 500 or above.

_________________
Blog:http://austinthemusical.wordpress.com
Twitter:https://twitter.com/#!/vegan_cowboy


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  



{ ASACP_CREDITS }
{ ASACP_CREDITS }
{ ASACP_CREDITS } Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group