Sknydpr Posted September 23, 2005 Share Posted September 23, 2005 seems to have started an anti-fur campaign. What a change in direction, huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
compassionategirl Posted September 23, 2005 Share Posted September 23, 2005 What???!!!! YOU mean cosmopolitan. The editor of cosmopolitan, Anne Winter or something like that, is a fur loving, superficial ice queen who has not given the animals' a chance in her magazine to tell their side of the story. Dan, tell me more!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sknydpr Posted September 23, 2005 Author Share Posted September 23, 2005 This is all I've found so far: http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/7242_1466493,00180010.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sknydpr Posted September 23, 2005 Author Share Posted September 23, 2005 http://www.hsus.org/wildlife/issues_facing_wildlife/fur_and_trapping/fashion_week_2005_fur_blog.html#Cosmo_UK It looks like it's just the UK edition. That's a shocker; not the U.S. edition?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted September 23, 2005 Share Posted September 23, 2005 I wonder what the stance is on leather. "But leather's different, because I'm an asshole" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
veganmadre Posted September 23, 2005 Share Posted September 23, 2005 I wonder what the stance is on leather. "But leather's different, because I'm an asshole" Mwa Ha haha! Such fantastic cynicism. Gawdayelubet! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CollegeB Posted September 23, 2005 Share Posted September 23, 2005 Actually back in the day (~1880's) cosmopolitan had anti vivisection articles too. And I saw one about Horace Greely who is a rarely mentioned part of vegetarian history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now