Jump to content

What is your ideal physique?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 766
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Wow.. My ideal physique is not of a muscle bound body. But rather a strong but very feminine build... The hourglass figure.. Nice rounded arms small wasp waist. Nice strong legs and a round booty... Well developed calves and arched feet... Any ideas on how to get there??? See samples below wow.....

Arched feet? Really?

 

Feminine build is in the eye of the beholder. To me, arched feet, brazillian wax jobs, and breast implants aren't feminine, they're ridiculously limiting, like foot binding. I don't think too many runners or cyclists (or anyone for that matter) can function as well after all their pubic hair has been ripped out by the roots. And I'm sure the extra weight of double e sized implants reduce performance significantly, and at the very least cause back problems. To me, a strong but feminine build is one that lets women be as strong as they can be

http://www.stcroixtriathlon.com/images/karentrek.jpg

speed is sexy

http://www.college.columbia.edu/cct_archive/jan03/images/Vardaros-new.jpg

check those vegan quads

http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/12_03/running2212_468x436.jpg

delts ready to get down

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya fair enough. Just poking at ya.

 

 

EDIT: I wanna look like this guy

 

 

 

jesus christ! no shit! who wouldn't want to look like that guy! I suppose the guys that run 70sbig.com...

 

The guy looks pretty solid, but he has the upper back musculature of a 5 year old girl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya fair enough. Just poking at ya.

 

 

EDIT: I wanna look like this guy

 

 

 

jesus christ! no shit! who wouldn't want to look like that guy! I suppose the guys that run 70sbig.com...

 

The guy looks pretty solid, but he has the upper back musculature of a 5 year old girl

 

Correction, I've seen 5 year old girls with better upper and lower back musculature than him

 

It's a shame to have a front that looks that good and neglect the entire upper and lower back (and possibly everything else from the waist down). Anyone care to take bets that his legs are about the size of his forearms?

 

I guess some people are primarily concerned with showing off their chest and arms. I don't understant it myself, but to each their own, I suppose!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. He looks like the typical gym-goer who might do a couple of sets of quarter squats as his leg workout for the week. I'd love to be proven wrong though.

 

To me, powerful strong legs and backs are much more impressive than huge pumped up chests and arms.

 

http://www.tmuscle.com/img/photos/07-085-training/image010.jpg

 

http://stronglifts.com/wp-content/uploads/ivan-stoitsov.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am the opposite of most: all back and legs. Cool with me, because I love muscular backs and legs. I think it is mostly because it gives a "workhorse" look. If someone has a huge back and legs, you know they are going to be able to do some hard, heavy labor. Or at least they look capable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off, Dallas, what gives with you, man? No offense (ok, maybe a little), but here Henry Rollins is a huge influence to you, but in your music thread it's all disturbed and godsmack and Korn?!?!

 

DUDE! Give up on the radio metal and roll with Henry. He'll steer you in a better direction. State of Alert for the win!

 

 

Back on topic. (with terrible music)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jT_3LAhd0LE&feature=related

(except I want legs to match the top body!)

(I have been failing at embedding videos lately. not even gonna try tonight)

 

this dude is just amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off, Dallas, what gives with you, man? No offense (ok, maybe a little), but here Henry Rollins is a huge influence to you, but in your music thread it's all disturbed and godsmack and Korn?!?!

 

DUDE! Give up on the radio metal and roll with Henry. He'll steer you in a better direction. State of Alert for the win!

 

What's wrong with radio metal? Music is just subjective sound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's wrong with radio metal? Music is just subjective sound.

 

You mean aside from the "angry" lyrics? Except for the lyrics are absolutely meaningless (more often than not. there are exception). It's teen angst music made by dudes in their 20's and 30's trying to cash in. I 100% get being angry and singing about it. Most of my music is pissed about something. But most of what I listen to is tangible.

 

That, and it just sucks.

 

BUT, you're free to listen to what you want to. I don't really care. My point is that Henry Rollins could have gotten you into so much more meaningful music. You're right on the cusp.

 

And yes, music is just subjective sound. Until you add words. otherwise we'd all just listen to instrumentals. The words are what make the song meaningful.

 

OR maybe I'm way off base and I should shut up. that's likely too. Go give black flag and state of alert another chance. Read the lyrics. connect with the songs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




×
×
  • Create New...