Jump to content

lierre keith gets pied


beforewisdom
 Share

Recommended Posts

Lierre Keith should send a fruit basket with a 'thank you" note to the 3 people who pied her.

 

People who never would have heard of or cared about her book might just buy it to see what all of the fuss is about.

 

She can also point out to reasonable, but uninformed people 3 examples of what she means by vegans being juvenile.

 

Hitting her with a pie was a stupid thing to do that helped her and likely hurt animals by making other people a little more hesitant to listen to vegans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before she got hit with the 3 pies, Keith's book was ranked at about #4500 on Amazon. As of about 5 min ago the sales ranking of her book was #1420. She also got interviewed by the local news as a result of being hit with the pies. A big theme of her book is that vegans are just a childish, intolerant, mean sub culture. Now she has a youtube video showing that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
Some anarchist vegan/AR group just purchased the domain VegetarianMyth.com and put up an entire web site contradicting the factual mistakes Keith made in her book:

 

http://www.vegetarianmyth.com/

 

I'm the one who bought it. We're not at anarchist- just vegan. It got started right after the pie incident though. It's lost a bit of steam as we've all realized how low her profile is but I think I may keep going with it soon. If anyone has read (or would like to read) the book and contribute to the site, PM me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Erik Marcus recently posted about an article Keith wrote for Mother Earth News(http://www.motherearthnews.com/nature-community/the-truth-about-vegetarianism.aspx):

 

http://www.vegan.com/blog/2010/08/02/lierre-keiths-truth-about-vegetarianism/

 

In it he pointed to an excellent review of her book that ripped it to shreds:

http://www.amazon.com/review/R3M4LC3USB5H3S?ie=UTF8&ref_=cm_cr_rdp_perm

 

My favorite quote from that review

 

The author sites 207 references in this book.

62 of those references are websites (~30%)

18 are newspapers and magazines (~7%)

32 are journals (~15%)

95 are other books (~46%)

 

First of all, think about that. 30% of the references in this book come from website information. Five of those 62 website references were Wikipedia. Wikipedia! One was Google Answers. I wont let my freshmen students use Wikipedia as a reference in their papers, why would it be acceptable for a book? Like websites, newspaper and magazine information needs to be taken with a grain of salt. Of the 32 journals less than half come from well known, peer-reviewed sources. The remaining 46% are books, which can truly say anything the author cares to print (as this one does) and only show that the author is getting her information from another source (and another opinion) aside from the primary one. The point of this is to make clear that this is a book that is sold as (and which many positive reviews hype as) providing scientific, factual, intellectual knowledge on the vegetarian/diet/health debate. In reality less than 8% of the book is coming from peer-reviewed, fact-checked sources which can provide unbiased, neutral information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...